Key Takeaways
- Radiology report = Radiologist's written interpretation of your CT scan images
- Two main sections: "Findings" (detailed description) and "Impression" (summary conclusion)
- "Unremarkable" = Normal (good news in radiology!)
- "No acute findings" = No new or urgent problems found
- "Clinical correlation recommended" = Radiologist wants your doctor's input to interpret findings
- Results sent to ordering doctor = Radiologist sends report to doctor who ordered scan (not directly to you usually)
- Wait for doctor's explanation = Radiologist provides image interpretation; your doctor explains what it means for your health
How We Created This Results Guide
Our radiology report guidance is based on report standards, medical terminology, and patient communication research.
Data Sources Analyzed:
| Source | Type of Data | How Used |
|---|---|---|
| RSNA (Radiological Society of North America) | Radiology report standards | Report structure, terminology |
| ACR (American College of Radiology) | Practice guidelines | Reporting standards |
| Real radiology reports | Actual report examples | How reports are written |
| Patient feedback | Common questions, confusion points | What patients want to know |
| Medical terminology resources | Definitions, explanations | Plain language explanations |
What Is a Radiology Report?
Who Writes the Report?
Radiologist: Medical doctor (MD or DO) who specializes in:
- Interpreting medical images: CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound
- 4-6 years residency training: After medical school
- Board-certified (most): In radiology
- Writes report: Based on image interpretation
Not the technologist:
- Technologist performs scan: Captures images
- Technologist cannot interpret: (not trained, not allowed to provide diagnosis)
- Technologist captures: What radiologist interprets
Report Timeline
When will results be ready?
| Timing | What Happens |
|---|---|
| Immediately after scan | Radiologist begins reviewing images |
| 30 minutes - 2 hours | Radiologist interprets images, writes report |
| 24-48 hours | Report sent to ordering doctor (sometimes same day) |
| 3-5 days | You receive results from ordering doctor |
Urgent scans (emergency department):
- STAT read: Radiologist prioritizes urgent scans
- Preliminary report: Within 30 minutes
- Final report: Completed within 24 hours
Anatomy of a Radiology Report
Standard Report Structure
Most CT reports follow this structure:
| Section | What It Contains | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Exam/Procedure | What scan was performed | "CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast" |
| Clinical Indication | Reason for scan | "Evaluate for abdominal pain" |
| Technique | Scan details | "5 mm slices obtained through liver and kidneys" |
| Comparison | Prior imaging comparison | "Compared to CT scan from 2 years ago" |
| Findings | Detailed description of what scan shows | "Liver normal. 2 cm hypodense lesion in right kidney..." |
| Impression | Summary conclusion | "1. Right kidney mass, concerning for malignancy. 2. No liver lesions." |
Let's break down each section:
Exam/Procedure
Identifies the scan performed:
Examples:
- "CT of the head without contrast"
- "CT of the chest with intravenous contrast"
- "CT of the abdomen and pelvis with and without contrast"
- "CT angiography of the chest"
What to check:
- Correct body area: Head vs. chest vs. abdomen?
- Correct contrast status: With or without contrast?
- Correct extent: Chest only vs. chest/abdomen/pelvis?
Clinical Indication
Reason scan was ordered:
Examples:
- "Clinical indication: Headache"
- "Clinical indication: Suspected appendicitis"
- "Clinical indication: Staging of known lung cancer"
- "Clinical indication: Abdominal pain of unknown etiology"
What to check:
- Does indication match why you had scan?
- Is indication specific? ("Abdominal pain" vs. just "Pain")
Technique
Technical details of scan:
Typical content:
- "5 mm slices obtained from [body part] through [specific area]"
- "Images obtained in the [arterial/venous] phase"
- "Multiplanar reformations obtained"
- "3D reconstructions performed"
Translation to plain language:
- "5 mm slices": Scan captures 5 mm cross-sections of body
- "Arterial phase": Images captured 30 seconds after contrast injection
- "Venous phase": Images captured 70 seconds after contrast injection (shows different things)
- "Multiplanar reformations": Computer creates images in different planes (sagittal, coronal)
- "3D reconstructions": Computer creates 3D model from scan data
Most patients: Don't need to understand technique section - it's for technical documentation.
Comparison
Prior imaging comparison:
Examples:
- "Compared to CT scan from 06/15/2025"
- "No prior imaging available for comparison"
- "Interval change: [finding] has increased/decreased/stable since prior examination"
What comparison tells you:
- Is this new or old?: Problem seen on prior scans
- Is it changing?: Growing, shrinking, stable
- Is it better or worse?: Improvement or progression of disease
The "Findings" Section
What Findings Contains
Detailed description of what radiologist sees:
Example Findings section:
FINDINGS:
Lungs:
- Clear bilaterally. No pulmonary nodules, masses, or consolidations.
- No pleural or pericardial effusion.
- Cardiac size normal.
Liver:
- Enlarged (18 cm craniocaudal dimension). Fat sparing suggests fatty change.
- No focal liver lesions.
- Gallbladder, biliary ducts, spleen unremarkable.
Pancreas:
- 2.5 cm cystic lesion in pancreatic tail. Cannot characterize on CT.
- Pancreas otherwise normal.
Kidneys:
- 1.2 cm hypodense lesion in right mid-kidney. Concerning for renal cell carcinoma.
- Left kidney normal. No hydronephrosis.
Aorta:
- No aneurysm. Vessel caliber normal.
- No significant atherosclerotic calcification.
Lymph nodes:
- No pathologically enlarged lymph nodes.
- No lymphadenopathy.
Bones:
- No fractures or lytic lesions.
- Degenerative changes in lumbar spine.
Common Terminology in Findings
| Term | Meaning | Good or Bad? |
|---|---|---|
| Unremarkable | Normal; nothing to report | ✅ Good |
| Normal | No abnormalities | ✅ Good |
| No acute findings | No new or urgent problems | ✅ Generally good |
| Grossly unremarkable | Entirely normal | ✅ Good |
| Within normal limits | Normal | ✅ Good |
| Negative | No abnormality found | ✅ Good |
| No significant abnormality | Nothing important found | ✅ Good |
| Lesion | Abnormal finding (could be benign or malignant) | ⚠️ Needs context |
| Mass | Solid abnormality (could be benign or malignant) | ⚠️ Needs context |
| Nodule | Small rounded abnormality (could be benign or malignant) | ⚠️ Needs context |
| Cyst | Fluid-filled sac (usually benign) | ✅ Usually benign |
| Hypodense | Darker on CT (less dense) | ⚠️ Depends (cyst vs. tumor) |
| Hyperdense | Brighter on CT (more dense) | ⚠️ Depends (blood, calcium, contrast) |
| Enhancing | Lights up with contrast (has blood supply) | ⚠️ Often concerning (tumors enhance) |
| Non-enhancing | Doesn't light up with contrast | ✅ Often benign (cysts, scar tissue) |
| Enlarged | Larger than normal | ⚠️ Depends (organ vs. organ) |
| Dilated | Widened (e.g., blood vessel, bile duct) | ⚠️ Depends (blockage vs. normal) |
| Stenosis | Narrowing (usually blood vessel) | ❌ Usually bad (blockage) |
| Occlusion | Blockage | ❌ Bad (blood vessel blocked) |
| Effusion | Fluid collection | ⚠️ Depends (inflammation, blood) |
| Consolidation | Area of lung filled with fluid/infection | ⚠️ Usually bad (pneumonia) |
| Infiltrate | Area of abnormality | ⚠️ Depends (infection, inflammation) |
Body-Specific Findings
Head/Brain CT findings:
| Finding | Meaning |
|---|---|
| No acute intracranial abnormality | No new brain bleed, stroke, mass |
| No midline shift | Brain not pushed to one side (no mass effect) |
| Ventricles and sulci | Normal |
| Hyperdense focus | Bright spot (may be acute blood, calcium) |
| Hypodensity | Dark area (may be old stroke, tumor) |
| Mass effect | Structure pushed by adjacent mass (tumor, bleeding) |
Chest CT findings:
| Finding | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Clear bilaterally | Both lungs clear (no pneumonia) |
| No nodules, masses, consolidations | No tumors, pneumonia |
| Pleural effusion | Fluid in space around lungs (infection, heart failure) |
| Cardiomegaly | Enlarged heart (heart disease) |
| Aortic aneurysm | Ballooning of aorta (can rupture) |
| Pulmonary embolism | Blood clot in lung arteries (life-threatening) |
Abdominal CT findings:
| Finding | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Hepatomegaly | Enlarged liver (fatty liver, hepatitis) |
| Fatty liver | Fat deposits in liver (common, usually benign) |
| Hypodense liver lesion | Dark spot in liver (could be cyst, metastasis, HCC) |
| Renal calculi | Kidney stones |
| Hydronephrosis | Kidney swollen from backup (kidney stone blocking urine) |
| Lymphadenopathy | Enlarged lymph nodes (cancer, infection) |
| Ascites | Fluid in abdomen (liver disease, cancer) |
The "Impression" Section
What Is the Impression?
Impression = Conclusion:
Summary of most important findings:
- Diagnoses: What radiologist thinks findings represent
- Urgent findings: What needs immediate attention
- Recommendations: What should happen next (clinical correlation, follow-up)
Example Impression:
IMPRESSION:
1. 1.2 cm right renal mass. Concerning for renal cell carcinoma.
Recommend: Clinical correlation, urology referral, consider MRI for further characterization.
2. Fatty liver (enlarged liver with fat deposition).
Recommend: Clinical correlation with liver function tests.
Follow-up: Ultrasound in 6-12 months if clinically indicated.
3. 2.5 cm pancreatic tail lesion. Cannot characterize on CT.
Recommend: MRI with MRCP for further characterization.
4. No acute findings in chest, bones, or lymph nodes.
Common Impression Terminology
| Phrase | Meaning | What It Means for You |
|---|---|---|
| No acute findings | No urgent problems | ✅ Generally good news |
| Within normal limits | Normal | ✅ Good news |
| Unremarkable | Normal | ✅ Good news |
| Clinical correlation recommended | Radiologist wants doctor's input | ⚠️ Not definite; needs clinical context |
| Cannot exclude | Cannot rule out | ⚠️ May need follow-up |
| Concerning for | Suspicious for | ⚠️ May be serious; needs evaluation |
| Suggestive of | Looks like | ⚠️ May be diagnosis but not definite |
| Consistent with | Matches appearance of | ✅ May be diagnosis (if clinical context fits) |
| Cannot characterize | Can't tell what it is | ⚠️ Needs further imaging (often MRI) |
Numbered Format
Findings grouped in Impression:
Impression items listed in order of importance:
- Most important: Findings needing immediate attention
- Secondary: Findings that are important but not urgent
- Minor: Findings that are incidental or not clinically significant
Example:
IMPRESSION:
1. Right renal mass concerning for renal cell carcinoma (most important, urgent)
2. Fatty liver (important but not urgent)
3. Pancreatic cyst (needs characterization but not urgent)
4. No acute findings (reassurance)
Common Result Scenarios
Scenario 1: Normal Scan
Impression:
IMPRESSION:
1. No acute abnormality.
2. Normal CT scan.
What this means:
- ✅ Normal scan: No problems found
- ✅ No acute issues: Nothing urgent or new
- Translation: Everything looks normal
Scenario 2: Incidental Finding
Impression:
IMPRESSION:
1. 4 cm adrenal nodule in left adrenal gland.
Clinical correlation recommended.
What this means:
- ⚠️ Incidental finding: Found by chance, not what scan was looking for
- Adrenal nodule: Abnormal growth on adrenal gland
- Clinical correlation: Radiologist wants doctor to check hormone levels
- May be benign: Most adrenal nodules are benign
- May need workup: Hormone tests, possibly follow-up scan
Scenario 3: Urgent Finding
Impression:
IMPRESSION:
1. Large saddle embolus in main pulmonary artery.
Life-threatening condition. Immediate attention required.
What this means:
- 🚨 PE (pulmonary embolism): Blood clot in lung arteries
- 🚨 Life-threatening: Emergency, needs immediate treatment
- Next steps: Blood thinners, hospital admission
Scenario 4: Needs Follow-Up
Impression:
IMPRESSION:
1. 1 cm lung nodule in right upper lobe.
Cannot characterize benign vs. malignant.
Recommend: Follow-up CT in 3 months to assess stability.
What this means:
- ⚠️ Lung nodule: Small spot in lung
- ⚠️ Uncertain: Could be benign (scar, infection) or malignant (cancer)
- ⚠️ Stability assessment: If nodule doesn't grow over 3 months, likely benign
- Next steps: Repeat CT in 3 months to check for growth
Scenario 5: Clinical Correlation Needed
Impression:
IMPRESSION:
1. 2 cm liver lesion. Cannot characterize on CT.
Clinical correlation recommended with liver function tests and history of cirrhosis.
What this means:
- ⚠️ Liver lesion: Abnormal area in liver
- ⚠️ CT can't tell: What it is (tumor, cyst, benign lesion)
- ⚠️ Clinical context: Radiologist needs:
- Liver function tests: Blood tests showing liver function
- History of cirrhosis: Risk factor for liver cancer
- Next steps: Doctor considers clinical context to decide on next steps (MRI, biopsy, follow-up)
Getting Your Results
How Results Are Delivered
Typical timeline:
| Timing | Step |
|---|---|
| Scan performed | Images captured |
| Radiologist interprets | Within 30 minutes - 2 hours |
| Report finalized | Within 24-48 hours (same day for urgent) |
| Report sent to ordering doctor | Electronically via PACS/RIS |
| Doctor reviews results | Within 1-3 days of receiving report |
| Doctor contacts you | With results, next steps |
Emergency scans:
- Preliminary report: Within 30 minutes
- Final report: Within 24 hours
- Doctor contacts you: Immediately if urgent findings
How You Receive Results
Methods of receiving results:
| Method | How It Works |
|---|---|
| Phone call | Doctor calls you with results |
| Patient portal | Results posted to online portal (you log in to view) |
| Letter/mail | Results sent via mail (slower) |
| In-person visit | Discuss results at follow-up appointment |
What you receive:
- Verbal explanation: Doctor explains findings in plain language
- Copy of report: Sometimes provided (especially if seeing specialist)
- Images: Usually not provided unless requested (separate process)
Questions to Ask About Results
Understanding Your Results
Ask your doctor:
- "What does 'unremarkable' mean?" - Confirm it's normal
- "What are the key findings?" - What problems found, if any
- "Is this serious?" - How concerning are findings?
- "What caused this finding?" - Underlying cause
- "What happens next?" - Treatment, monitoring, more tests
- "Do I need a follow-up scan?" - When, why
- "Should I see a specialist?" - Which specialist
- "Can you explain these medical terms?" - Plain language explanation
If Results Are Unclear
"Clinical correlation recommended":
What radiologist means:
- CT shows abnormality
- Cannot determine significance without clinical context
- Your doctor provides: Clinical information (symptoms, labs, history)
- Together determine: What abnormality means
Example:
- CT shows: 2 cm liver lesion
- Radiologist: "Cannot characterize. Clinical correlation recommended."
- Your doctor provides:
- History of hepatitis C: Risk factor for liver cancer → lesion concerning
- Normal liver function tests: Less concerning → may be benign
- Symptoms of weight loss: More concerning for cancer
- Together decide: Need liver MRI, biopsy, or follow-up CT
If You Disagree with Results
If findings make sense with your symptoms:
- Agreement: CT findings match clinical picture
- Next steps: Treat based on diagnosis
- Follow-up: Repeat scan if monitoring response to treatment
Example:
- CT shows: Appendicitis (inflamed appendix)
- Symptoms: Right lower abdominal pain, fever
- Agreement: CT and symptoms consistent
- Next steps: Surgery to remove appendix
If You Disagree with Results
If findings don't match your symptoms:
Example:
- CT shows: Normal
- Symptoms: Severe abdominal pain, vomiting
- Discrepancy: CT doesn't explain symptoms
Your options:
- Ask about alternative imaging: MRI, ultrasound might show what CT misses
- Ask about clinical correlation: "CT normal but I'm in pain - what's next?"
- Second opinion: Different radiologist may review same images differently
- Follow your gut: If symptoms persist, advocate for further evaluation
Getting Copy of Report and Images
Requesting Your Report
How to get radiology report:
| Method | How |
|---|---|
| Patient portal | Log in to patient portal; reports usually available within 3-5 days |
| Medical records request | Submit written request to hospital medical records department |
| Doctor's office | Your doctor can provide copy of report |
| Health information exchange | If your doctor uses HIE, may access records electronically |
Requesting Your Images (DICOM)
How to get your images:
| Method | How |
|---|---|
| Patient portal | Some portals allow image download |
| Medical records request | Request DICOM copy (usually on CD) |
| Imaging center | Call imaging center; ask for "DICOM CD" |
| Bring CDs to specialist | If seeing specialist, bring your DICOM CDs |
Why get DICOM images:
- Second opinion: Specialist can review your images
- Personal records: Keep for your files
- Comparison: Future radiologists can compare to current scans
What to ask for:
”"I'd like a copy of my CT scan in DICOM format. Can you put this on CD or provide electronic download?"
Understanding Follow-Up Recommendations
Common Follow-Up Scenarios
Incidental lung nodule:
| Size | Recommendation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| <4 mm | No follow-up needed | Too small to be concerning |
| 4-6 mm | Optional follow-up CT in 12 months | Risk very low but not zero |
| 6-8 mm | Follow-up CT in 6-12 months | Small but needs monitoring |
| 8 mm+ | Follow-up CT in 3-6 months | Larger = higher concern |
Adrenal nodule:
| Size | Recommendation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| <1 cm | No follow-up needed | Too small to be concerning |
| 1-4 cm | Hormone testing, consider MRI | Determine if functional (hormone-producing) |
| 4 cm+ | Surgery consultation | Large, may be malignant |
Liver lesion:
| Characteristic | Next Step | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Cyst (fluid-filled) | No follow-up needed | Benign |
| Hemangioma (blood vessel tumor) | MRI to confirm if needed | Usually benign |
| Hypovascular (doesn't enhance with contrast) | Ultrasound or MRI to characterize | Could be cancer |
| Hypervascular (enhances with contrast) | MRI, possible biopsy | Concerning for cancer |
Second Opinions
When to Consider Second Opinion
Reasons to seek second opinion:
| Situation | Why Second Opinion Helps |
|---|---|
| Diagnosis unclear | Different radiologist may see same images differently |
| Recommended surgery | Confirm surgery necessary before proceeding |
| Rare diagnosis | Expert opinion from specialist center |
| Discrepancy | Symptoms don't match imaging findings |
| Conflicting recommendations | One doctor says surgery, another says watch and wait |
How to get second opinion:
- Bring DICOM images: On CD or portable drive
- Bring radiology report: Copy of original report
- Bring clinical information: Symptoms, lab results, history
- Ask specific questions: "What does this lesion look like to you? How certain are you?"
Second opinion outcomes:
- Agrees with original: Reinforces diagnosis, treatment plan
- Disagrees with original: Different interpretation, different recommendation
- Adds certainty: Either way, more confident in diagnosis
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Discussing Your Results
Ask these questions to understand your results:
- "What are the main findings?" - Summary of important findings
- "What is the diagnosis?" - What do the findings represent
- "What caused this?" - Underlying cause or explanation
- "Is this concerning?" - How serious are the findings
- "What are my options?" - Treatment, monitoring, watch and wait
- "Do I need more tests?" - MRI, biopsy, lab tests
- "How soon do I need treatment?" - Urgency of treatment
- "What happens if I don't treat?" - Risks of no treatment
- "What should I watch for?" - Symptoms that should prompt urgent call
- "When should I follow up?" - Timeline for next appointment
If Diagnosis Is Serious
Receiving serious diagnosis (cancer, aneurysm, etc.):
- Take time to process: It's OK to feel shocked, scared, overwhelmed
- Ask questions: Understand your diagnosis
- Ask about treatment options: Surgery, medication, radiation
- Ask about prognosis: What to expect
- Ask about specialists: Should you see cancer specialist, vascular surgeon?
- Bring support person: Family member, friend to appointment for help listening, asking questions
- Consider second opinion: Especially for serious diagnoses or major treatments
- Take notes: Hard to remember everything when stressed
Common Concerns
"Clinical Correlation Recommended"
What this means:
Radiologist needs clinical context:
- CT shows: Abnormal finding
- CT alone cannot determine: What abnormality is
- Doctor provides: Clinical context (symptoms, labs, history)
- Together determine: Significance of finding
Example:
- CT shows: 1.5 cm lung nodule
- Risk factors: Smoking history, family history of lung cancer
- Clinical correlation: Radiologist needs to know:
- Smoking history: 30 pack-years (high risk) → more concerning
- Age: 65 years old → risk factor for cancer
- Symptoms: Cough, weight loss → concerning
- Prior imaging: Nodule new (vs. seen on old scan and stable) → concerning
- With risk factors: Likely recommends biopsy
- Without risk factors: May recommend follow-up CT
Bottom line: "Clinical correlation recommended" means radiologist can't make definitive diagnosis without clinical context.
"Cannot Characterize"
What this means:
CT shows abnormality but can't tell what it is:
| Finding | Possibilities | Next Step |
|---|---|---|
| Liver lesion | Cyst, hemangioma, metastasis, HCC | MRI, blood tests, biopsy |
| Pancreatic lesion | Cyst, neuroendocrine tumor, adenocarcinoma | MRI, blood tests, biopsy |
| Kidney lesion | Cyst, angiomyolipoma, renal cell carcinoma | MRI, follow-up, biopsy |
| Lung nodule | Granuloma, hamartoma, metastasis | PET scan, follow-up CT, biopsy |
Why "cannot characterize"?
- CT limitations: CT shows size, shape, density, but not specific
- MRI often better: MRI often can characterize what CT cannot
- Biopsy definitive: Only way to know for sure is tissue sample
Next steps:
- MRI: Often next step for further characterization
- PET scan: For lesions that might be cancer
- Biopsy: definitive diagnosis (but invasive)
- Follow-up CT: Watchful waiting to see if grows
The Bottom Line
Understanding your CT report:
- ✅ "Findings" = Detailed description of everything scan showed
- ✅ "Impression" = Summary conclusion, most important findings
- ✅ "Unremarkable" = Normal (good news!)
- ✅ "No acute findings" = Nothing urgent or new (usually good)
- ⚠️ "Clinical correlation recommended" = Needs doctor's input to interpret
Getting results:
- ✅ From ordering doctor: Not from radiologist (usually)
- ✅ Wait for doctor's call: Usually 3-5 days after scan
- ✅ Ask for copy of report: For your records, second opinion
- ✅ Ask questions: If you don't understand, ask doctor to explain
Most important: Radiology reports contain medical terminology that can be confusing. Always discuss your results with your ordering doctor, who can translate the report into plain language and explain what the findings mean for your health. Don't rely on Dr. Google or your own interpretation of radiology reports.
Related articles on WellAlly: